Standard round duct sizes
The diameters actually manufactured, in both systems: EN 1506 metric spiral from 63 to 1250 mm, and the imperial spiral range from 4 to 96 inches. Each size is listed with its cross-sectional area and the airflow band it typically carries at normal design velocities, plus a note on why the two lists do not line up.
Metric spiral duct — EN 1506
| Diameter | Area | Perimeter | Flow at 3 m/s | Flow at 8 m/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 mm | 0.0031 m² | 198 mm | 9 L/s | 25 L/s |
| 80 mm | 0.0050 m² | 251 mm | 15 L/s | 40 L/s |
| 100 mm | 0.0079 m² | 314 mm | 24 L/s | 63 L/s |
| 125 mm | 0.0123 m² | 393 mm | 37 L/s | 98 L/s |
| 160 mm | 0.0201 m² | 503 mm | 60 L/s | 161 L/s |
| 200 mm | 0.0314 m² | 628 mm | 94 L/s | 251 L/s |
| 250 mm | 0.0491 m² | 785 mm | 147 L/s | 393 L/s |
| 315 mm | 0.0779 m² | 990 mm | 234 L/s | 623 L/s |
| 355 mm | 0.0990 m² | 1,115 mm | 297 L/s | 792 L/s |
| 400 mm | 0.1257 m² | 1,257 mm | 377 L/s | 1,005 L/s |
| 450 mm | 0.1590 m² | 1,414 mm | 477 L/s | 1,272 L/s |
| 500 mm | 0.1963 m² | 1,571 mm | 589 L/s | 1,571 L/s |
| 560 mm | 0.2463 m² | 1,759 mm | 739 L/s | 1,970 L/s |
| 630 mm | 0.3117 m² | 1,979 mm | 935 L/s | 2,494 L/s |
| 710 mm | 0.3959 m² | 2,231 mm | 1,188 L/s | 3,167 L/s |
| 800 mm | 0.5027 m² | 2,513 mm | 1,508 L/s | 4,021 L/s |
| 900 mm | 0.6362 m² | 2,827 mm | 1,909 L/s | 5,089 L/s |
| 1000 mm | 0.7854 m² | 3,142 mm | 2,356 L/s | 6,283 L/s |
| 1120 mm | 0.9852 m² | 3,519 mm | 2,956 L/s | 7,882 L/s |
| 1250 mm | 1.2272 m² | 3,927 mm | 3,682 L/s | 9,817 L/s |
The flow columns are the band a size sensibly covers, not a limit. Three metres per second is quiet and generous; eight is the top of the general commercial band. Pick within the band using the velocity chart for the application.
Imperial spiral duct
| Diameter | Area | Metric equivalent | Flow at 600 fpm | Flow at 1600 fpm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 in | 0.087 ft² | 102 mm | 52 CFM | 140 CFM |
| 5 in | 0.136 ft² | 127 mm | 82 CFM | 218 CFM |
| 6 in | 0.196 ft² | 152 mm | 118 CFM | 314 CFM |
| 7 in | 0.267 ft² | 178 mm | 160 CFM | 428 CFM |
| 8 in | 0.349 ft² | 203 mm | 209 CFM | 559 CFM |
| 9 in | 0.442 ft² | 229 mm | 265 CFM | 707 CFM |
| 10 in | 0.545 ft² | 254 mm | 327 CFM | 873 CFM |
| 11 in | 0.660 ft² | 279 mm | 396 CFM | 1,056 CFM |
| 12 in | 0.785 ft² | 305 mm | 471 CFM | 1,257 CFM |
| 14 in | 1.069 ft² | 356 mm | 641 CFM | 1,710 CFM |
| 16 in | 1.396 ft² | 406 mm | 838 CFM | 2,234 CFM |
| 18 in | 1.767 ft² | 457 mm | 1,060 CFM | 2,827 CFM |
| 20 in | 2.182 ft² | 508 mm | 1,309 CFM | 3,491 CFM |
| 22 in | 2.640 ft² | 559 mm | 1,584 CFM | 4,224 CFM |
| 24 in | 3.142 ft² | 610 mm | 1,885 CFM | 5,027 CFM |
| 26 in | 3.687 ft² | 660 mm | 2,212 CFM | 5,899 CFM |
| 28 in | 4.276 ft² | 711 mm | 2,566 CFM | 6,842 CFM |
| 30 in | 4.909 ft² | 762 mm | 2,945 CFM | 7,854 CFM |
| 32 in | 5.585 ft² | 813 mm | 3,351 CFM | 8,936 CFM |
| 34 in | 6.305 ft² | 864 mm | 3,783 CFM | 10,088 CFM |
| 36 in | 7.069 ft² | 914 mm | 4,241 CFM | 11,310 CFM |
| 38 in | 7.876 ft² | 965 mm | 4,725 CFM | 12,601 CFM |
| 40 in | 8.727 ft² | 1,016 mm | 5,236 CFM | 13,963 CFM |
| 42 in | 9.621 ft² | 1,067 mm | 5,773 CFM | 15,394 CFM |
| 44 in | 10.559 ft² | 1,118 mm | 6,336 CFM | 16,895 CFM |
| 46 in | 11.541 ft² | 1,168 mm | 6,925 CFM | 18,466 CFM |
| 48 in | 12.566 ft² | 1,219 mm | 7,540 CFM | 20,106 CFM |
| 52 in | 14.748 ft² | 1,321 mm | 8,849 CFM | 23,597 CFM |
| 56 in | 17.104 ft² | 1,422 mm | 10,263 CFM | 27,367 CFM |
| 60 in | 19.635 ft² | 1,524 mm | 11,781 CFM | 31,416 CFM |
| 64 in | 22.340 ft² | 1,626 mm | 13,404 CFM | 35,744 CFM |
| 72 in | 28.274 ft² | 1,829 mm | 16,965 CFM | 45,239 CFM |
| 80 in | 34.907 ft² | 2,032 mm | 20,944 CFM | 55,851 CFM |
| 88 in | 42.237 ft² | 2,235 mm | 25,342 CFM | 67,579 CFM |
| 96 in | 50.265 ft² | 2,438 mm | 30,159 CFM | 80,425 CFM |
The metric equivalent column is the exact conversion, not a standard size — 16 inches is 406 mm, which is not an EN 1506 diameter. That mismatch is the point of the next section.
Why the two lists do not meet
Metric spiral duct follows a preferred-number series: each size is roughly 1.12 to 1.25 times the one below it, so the steps are proportional rather than absolute. That is why the gaps grow — 25 mm between 100 and 125, but 100 mm between 900 and 1000. Imperial sizing grew from whole-inch shop practice instead, in one-inch steps to 12 inches and two-inch steps beyond, which produces a series that starts finer and coarsens differently.
The practical consequence appears on international projects. A design done in inches and issued to a metric fabricator produces schedules full of 356 and 406 mm duct, neither of which is stocked. The fix is not conversion but redesign: size the duct in the system it will be purchased in, using the standard list for that market, and let the two schedules differ. A 400 mm duct and a 16 inch duct are not the same duct, and pretending otherwise puts a 1.5 per cent area error into every branch of the system.
Notes for specification and coordination
- Nominal is internal. Spiral sizes refer to the air path. Add the sheet thickness for the outside, then the insulation, then clearance for hangers before booking void space.
- Fittings follow the same list. Bends, tees and reducers are made for standard diameters. A non-standard duct means non-standard fittings, which is where the cost actually lands.
- Round beats rectangular where it fits. Least perimeter for the area means less metal, less insulation and less friction. Reach for rectangular when the void forces it, not by default.
- Above about 1000 mm, check handling. Manufacture is rarely the constraint; getting the section through the building and hanging it usually is.
Frequently asked questions
What are the standard round duct sizes?
In metric markets, spiral duct follows EN 1506: 63, 80, 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 315, 355, 400, 450, 500, 560, 630, 710, 800, 900, 1000, 1120 and 1250 mm. In imperial markets the range runs 4 to 12 inches in one-inch steps, then 14 to 48 in two-inch steps, then 52, 56, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88 and 96 inches. Sizes outside these lists exist but are made to order and priced accordingly.
Why do metric and imperial duct sizes not line up?
Because they were standardised separately, from different starting points. EN 1506 follows a preferred-number progression — each size roughly 1.12 to 1.25 times the one below — while the imperial list grew from whole-inch practice. The result is that 400 mm sits between 15 and 16 inches, and 16 inches is 406 mm. Converting a size from one system to the other almost never lands on a diameter you can buy, so design in the system the duct will be purchased in.
What airflow does each duct size carry?
It depends entirely on the velocity you design to, which is why this page shows a band rather than a single figure. The table below gives the flow at 3 m/s — quiet, generous, typical of a branch near occupied space — and at 8 m/s, the top of the general commercial band. The same 400 mm duct carries 380 L/s at the quiet end and 1005 L/s at the busy end, and both are legitimate answers to different questions.
Is duct diameter measured inside or outside?
Nominal spiral duct sizes refer to the internal diameter, which is what matters for the air. The outside diameter is slightly larger by the sheet thickness, and with insulation the overall dimension grows considerably — a 400 mm duct with 50 mm insulation needs 500 mm of clear space plus support. Coordinate the void on the outside dimension, size the air on the inside one.
Should I use round or rectangular duct?
Round wherever the void allows it. For the same air and the same pressure loss, round duct needs less metal, less insulation, fewer stiffeners and less labour than any rectangular equivalent, because it encloses the most area for the least perimeter. Rectangular exists because ceiling voids are shallow, not because it is better. Where the void is tight but the friction penalty of a flat rectangular section is unwelcome, flat oval sits between the two.
What is the largest round duct available?
Spiral machines commonly run to 1250 mm in metric and 96 inches in imperial, but the practical ceiling is usually transport and handling rather than manufacture. Above roughly 1000 mm, sections get awkward to move through a building and heavy to hang, and rectangular or field-assembled construction often becomes more economic despite the friction penalty.
Last updated: 26 July 2026